|
|
Rewrite of Endangered Species Law Approved
House to Vote Soon; Senate Could in 2006
By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, September 23, 2005; A02
Setting the stage for the most sweeping restructuring of endangered
species protections in three decades, the House Resources Committee
yesterday approved legislation that would strengthen the hand of private
property owners and make it harder for federal officials to set aside
large swaths of habitat for imperiled plants and animals.
Committee Chairman Richard W. Pombo (R-Calif.), who has sought to revamp
the Endangered Species Act for more than a decade, said the bill would
make the landmark 32-year-old law more effective.
"The whole underlying premise of what we're trying to do is recover
species," Pombo said, adding that his measure would ensure "individual
property owners are not forced to shoulder the financial burden of
conserving endangered species for all Americans."
GOP leaders are eager to move the bill and it is expected to pass by a
comfortable margin next week. The question remains whether Senate
Republicans, who have begun hearings on the issue but have yet to
introduce legislation, can pass a bill that would allow the two chambers
to reach a compromise next year.
Many Democrats, as well as some Republicans and an array of
environmental groups, have voiced concern about Pombo's measure and
suggested it would not pass as it now stands.
The measure, which the panel approved 26 to 12 with eight Democrats
voting aye, would require the government to compensate landowners if it
declared some of their property off-limits to development to protect
federally listed species, and to decide such cases within 180 days.
Real estate developers and property owners have hailed the bill as a
long overdue rebalancing of the law, while environmentalists slammed it
as undermining critical protections. Critics of the current law note
that only a handful of the roughly 1,800 plants and animals listed over
the past 30 years have fully recovered, while supporters counter that an
equally small number have gone extinct during that period.
"Even schoolchildren know you can't protect plants and animals if you
don't protect the places where they live," said Susan Holmes, senior
legislative representative at Earthjustice, an advocacy group.
But Chuck Cushman, executive director of the American Land Rights
Association, of Battleground, Wash., said yesterday's action showed that
private property owners are winning the political argument over
endangered species.
The bill authorizes federal grants for property owners who voluntarily
take steps to protect species, and would pay them for lost business
profits on land the government sets aside for endangered and threatened
plants and animals. It also would allow the interior secretary to set a
scientific standard for declaring a species threatened or endangered,
rather than asking outside scientists to make judgments on a
case-by-case basis.
"I'm optimistic that enough people will realize after 31 years, the
failure rate [of species recovery] can't be tolerated, and there needs
to be some changes," Cushman said.
Sen. Lincoln D. Chafee (R-R.I.), who chairs the Senate subcommittee
charged with overseeing endangered species law, said yesterday he will
not decide how to proceed until he hears back from an advisory group of
environmentalists, landowners and government officials meeting in
Keystone, Colo.
The House, Chafee said, "is moving quickly," adding that once the
Keystone group reports to the Senate in 2006, he would be comfortable
drafting a bill. Offering financial incentives to landowners will be
key, he added. "If you care about protecting private property rights and
protecting species, it's going to revolve around funding issues," Chafee
said.
Pombo went out of his way yesterday to accommodate some Democrats'
amendments during the committee's deliberations, though many remained
skeptical because of the speeded-up timetable. The details of Pombo's
bill only became public on Monday.
When the chairman accepted an amendment by Rep. Mark Udall (D-Colo.)
restoring language that Pombo had deleted from the current law, the
Democrat remarked, "I've spent seven years trying to figure out how to
get Pombo to yield on an amendment, and that moment has arrived,"
prompting laughter from his colleagues.
Still, Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.) said he could not back Pombo's
proposal without scrutinizing the legislative language in detail.
"We've got to know exactly what we're doing," Miller said. "This is a
big deal."
|
|
|
We
accept Visa
MasterCard PayPal,
and cash
for all orders.
To place an order just click on
order
to send an email. Be sure to include a description of your
selection in the message, along with shipping and payment information.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
info@threegoddesses.com
Updated
09/23/2005
Copyright © 2004 -2005 Jennifer L. Fortado and The Three Goddesses
All Rights Reserved |